THE LMS PLATFORM OF THE EUCLID INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM
MANAGED BY EUCLID UNIVERSITY AND EULER-FRANEKER MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY

EULER Credit and Workload

TPH-499: Argumentation and Critical Thinking. Credit value in EULER programs: European LL.M. in International Law (core, 4 ECTS / 2 US credits); Master in International Relations and Global Development (core, 4 ECTS / 2 US credits); PhD in International Relations and Global Development (foundation, 4 ECTS / 2 US credits).

Activity Hours (4 ECTS)
Reading (approx. 300 pages at 20 pages per hour) 15
Video lectures, with notes 4
Response papers (5 x approx. 2,500 words, one per study period) 60
Student-created quiz (10 questions) 6
Major paper (approx. 4,000 words: research, drafting, revision) 22
Oral examination preparation 6
Oral examination (45 minutes) 0.75
Total student workload 113.75
Required band (25 to 30 hours per ECTS) 100-120

The course runs over seven study periods. Its credit value is justified by the total student workload above, at 25 to 30 hours per ECTS credit, under the EULER Credit Allocation and Conversion Policy (EULER-QA-CR-2025-01). The reading line reflects the standard reading allocation for the credit value and is verified against the course reading list in the termly syllabus audit.

Workload statement under the EULER Syllabus Standard (EULER-QA-SY-2025-01), Section 3 and Annex A. Version 2026-11 (2 November 2026). Credit values per the EULER Comprehensive Curriculum Integrity Matrix (EULER-QA-CI-2025-01).

Students should be aware that EUCLID’s Latin motto means “Let us also hear the other side.”

EUCLID’s academic philosophy bears the imprint of this ideal. For this reason, 2 credits are assigned to this important course which is considered foundational.

Study of the basic skills of good reasoning needed for the intelligent and responsible conduct of life. Topics include: argument structure and identification, validity and strength of arguments, common fallacies of reasoning, use and abuse of language in reasoning, principles of fair play in argumentation.

For most students (ask your instructor if this requirement does not apply), this course will also use recorded video lectures.

  • Credit value (EUCLID programs): 2 (US standard) | 5 (ECTS standard)
  • Indicative duration (full time): 2-3 weeks
  • Indicative duration (part-time): 4-6 week
  • Certificate: Yes
This course is based on standard EUCLID methodology. Students may refer to the following resources:

Academic Guidelines (HQ version)
Academic Guidelines (most recent version even if unofficial)
Student Orientation Guidelines (most recent version even if unofficial)
Zotero instructions for EUCLID students

At the end of this course, the student will be able to:

  • identify fallacies and flawed argumentation
  • articulate sound arguments
  • use proper terminology
  • analyze a debate or series of arguments
  • present a convincing case on any topic.

Note: some of the terms to be mastered include (this is a very partial list):

  • Inductive / Deductive
  • Ad Hominem
  • Equivocation
  • Syllogism
  • Straw man.
Some of the course material is provided in PDF format. Textbooks include:

  • Argumentation and Critical Thinking (Zarefsky)
  • Philosopher’s Toolbox
  • 42 Fallacies (LaBossiere)
  • EUCLID compiled material

Course Content

TPH-499 Period 1
TPH-499 Period 2
TPH-499 Period 3
TPH-499 Period 4
TPH-499 Period 5
TPH-499 Period 6
TPH-499 Period 7